Railroad Fencing

Studies show that fencing along railroad tracks deter both children and adults from entering the rights-of-way and encountering the inherent dangers of trains and railroad tracks. Railroad companies are fully aware that, because railroad tracks often divide neighborhoods, most people will walk across tracks rather than go several miles out of their way to reach a designated crossing. Railroads are also aware that children are naturally attracted to these tracks.

For decades, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and safety engineers have studied the monumental problem of pedestrian deaths on railroad tracks. As far back as the 1970s, the FRA has recommended fencing as a highly effective solution to deter pedestrians on tracks. Despite this, most major railroads refuse to fence their tracks, even in areas with high instances of pedestrian use, including areas where multiple fatalities have occurred.

It is interesting to note, however, that when cities, parks, and trails request to use land adjacent to tracks, railroad companies require those entities to build and pay for fencing, but refuse to do so themselves. Perhaps even more interesting is that railroads fence their own yards and facilities to deter trespassers, but refuse to build fencing in areas known to be dangerous.

Long-standing laws, regulations, and statutes of many states require railroads to fence off their tracks and rights-of-way. However, railroads often refuse to comply. A Minnesota law, for example, requires railroads in the state to fence both sides of its rights-of-way. The purpose of this statute is to protect children, and “the duty created by the statute is absolute” and “it is not a mere fence law, but a police regulation designed for benefit of the public” (Rosse v. St. Paul D.R. Co., 68 Minn. 216, 218. 1897). Minnesota has expressly and repeatedly held that its fencing statute mandates that railroads are 100 percent at fault when certain requirements are not met, such as when a railroad fails to build or maintain a fence and a child is injured. An example of this can be found in the case of a nine-year-old St. Paul boy, for which Bolt Hoffer Boyd was retained.

Another Minnesota law allows individuals and businesses that own property that abuts railroad tracks to request that the railroad build and maintain a durable fence. Depending on the time of year, railroads are then given 30 days to construct the fence. In the likely case that the railroad refuses to build such a fence, the property owners have the option to build the fence themselves and to seek double the cost of the fence, plus attorney fees, or initiate a lawsuit against the railroad for the cost of the fence, plus attorney fees.

To learn more about this type of claim, or to schedule an initial consultation, contact the experienced railroad attorneys of Bolt Hoffer Boyd. We deal with railroads across the country and thoroughly understand laws and facts regarding railroads and fencing.


Our Railroad and Train Accident Attorneys

Call us today for a free consultation: 763.406.7000

  • "We worked with Steve Helseth on establishing a trust. He made a potentially complex task very manageable. He …

    View testimonials
  • "I cannot say enough about the job Kelly Boyd did for me. My situation was a terrible mess, I had hired anothe…

    View testimonials
  • "Thank you just doesn’t come close to what you deserve for everything you have done for me. Over two years ago…

    View testimonials
  • "Our experience with Steve Helseth at Bolt Hoffer Boyd Law Firm was wonderfully pleasant. He handled our Esta…

    View testimonials
  • "I was referred to Kelly Boyd at this law firm and I couldn’t be happier! My situation required immediate and…

    View testimonials
  • “Legal representation was very important to my growing business and with different issues arising I needed to …

    View testimonials
  • "Joe worked extensively with me on a very long, drawn out litigation. He kept me informed of developments, gav…

    View testimonials
  • "Sending you a friendly reminder! It has been 10 long years since my 1st accident. I know, hard to believe! An…

    View testimonials
  • "I would like to thank you for all you have done for me. My case was complicated having the two insurance comp…

    View testimonials
  • "Our experience working with Steve and his firm, was simply, reassuring. When dealing with decisions as import…

    View testimonials
  • "Kelly Boyd was my lawyer in a divorce situation on two separate motions. She is knowledgeable, timely, thorou…

    View testimonials
  • "The effort and time that Joe put into our case was amazing. We have no magic words to show our appreciation.…

    View testimonials
  • "Kelly Boyd was invaluable in helping my family through a very complicated and very highly conflicted time. In…

    View testimonials
  • "My mother's checking/savings account over $50,000 was without beneficiary/Payable On Death, and therefore, in…

    View testimonials
  • "Words cannot express the amount of gratitude and a million thank you’s to you. What a pressure of relief off …

    View testimonials
  • "After having two different attorneys during my divorce proceedings I finally found Kelly Boyd a family law at…

    View testimonials
  • "We feel absolutely confident referring to Steve Helseth for estate planning. We are impressed with his exper…

    View testimonials
  • "We know that others will be served well by Steve Helseth. We had a great experience working with him on estab…

    View testimonials
  • "Joe is a great lawyer, he went the extra mile for me. I would hire him anytime."

    View testimonials
  • "We have no hesitation referring family, friends and neighbors to Steve Helseth. We had a great experience wo…

    View testimonials
  • "A neighbor said he saw sparks, but we didn’t see any fire. I ended up in the hospital for months. A friend of…

    View testimonials
  • "Joe was very informational, and precise on what the next steps would be, explaining how things will transpire…

    View testimonials
  • "I needed the direction and Christopher Hoffer provided that. He is very calm, well organized, and very capabl…

    View testimonials
  • "Initially, we worked with Steve Helseth on our estate plan, and because we had such a great experience workin…

    View testimonials
  • "I was referred to Kelly Boyd’s Law Firm and met with Kelly. I am so thankful for her. She helped me through t…

    View testimonials
  • "Steve Helseth of Bolt Hoffer Boyd Law Firm conducted the probate for my father’s will in Minnesota when I liv…

    View testimonials
  • "I was left with the daunting task of handling my mom's trust after her death. Working with Steve Helseth & B…

    View testimonials
  • "I couldn't have asked for a more patient and professional attorney. Joe is prompt in responding. He explained…

    View testimonials
  • "We worked with Steve Helseth on establishing a trust. With his expertise, he guided the process allowing us t…

    View testimonials
  • "In the last four years I have reached out to Steve Helseth for assistance with one very complex estate distri…

    View testimonials
  • "Steve and his team made the process of estate planning quite painless. There was much to consider. However, …

    View testimonials

Positive Results for Our Clients

Our personalized approach, dedicated focus areas, and years of combined legal experience produce successful, positive results for our clients.

View case results